Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry Dabbs Pdf Writer

  1. Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry Dabbs Pdf Writer Free
Diagnostic immunohistochemistry dabbs pdf writer software

Immunohistochemistry: Overview, Its Potential, and Challenges. Immunohistochemistry is a multistep pathology- based diagnostic tool that allows the visualization and identification in situ of specific cellular antigens that may be altered in response to a disease process or exposure to a toxicant. The technique is now well.

Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry Dabbs Pdf Writer Free

  1. Lin F, Chen ZM. Standardization of diagnostic immunohistochemistry – Literature review and Geisinger’s experience. Arch Pathol Lab Med. In press (December, 2014).Google Scholar
  2. Taylor CR, Shi SR, Barr NJ, et al. Techniques of immunohistochemistry: principles, pitfalls, and standardization. In: Dabbs DJ, editor. Diagnostic immunohistochemistry. 4th ed. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 2014. p. 1–38.Google Scholar
  3. Taylor CR. The total test approach to standardization of immunohistochemistry. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000;124(7):945–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Canadian Association of Pathologists-Association canadienne des pathologistes National Standards Committee, Torlakovic EE, Riddell R, Banerjee D, et al. Canadian Association of Pathologists-Association canadienne des pathologists National Standards Committee/Immunohistochemistry: best practice recommendations for standardization of immunohistochemistry tests. Am J Clin Pathol. 2010;133(3):354–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Goldstein NS, Hewitt SM, Taylor CR, et al. Recommendations for improved standardization of immunohistochemistry. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2007;15(2):124–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Goldstein NS, Ferkowicz M, Odish E, Mani A, Hastah F. Minimum formalin fixation time for consistent estrogen receptor immunohistochemical staining of invasive breast carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol. 2003;120(1):86–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Engel KB, Moore HM. Effects of preanalytical variables on the detection of proteins by immunohistochemistry in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011;135(5):537–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Shi SR, Gu J, Cote RJ, et al. Standardization of routine immunohistochemistry: where to begin. In: Shi S-R, Gu J, Taylor CR, editors. Antigen retrieval technique: immunohistochemistry and molecular morphology. Natick, MA: Eaton; 2000. p. 255–72.Google Scholar
  9. Ramos-Vara JA, Kiupel M, Baszler T, et al. Suggested guidelines for immunohistochemical techniques in veterinary diagnostic laboratories. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2008;20(4):393–413.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Morken T, Ruegg P. Validation and quality control for immunohistochemistry. Presented at the National Society for Histotechnology Symposium, Workshop #86, Seattle, WA, September 29, 2010. http://www.nsh.org/content/validation-and-quality-control-immunohistochemistry. Accessed 4 and 5 Jan 2014.
  11. Bussolati G, Leonardo E. Technical pitfalls potentially affecting diagnoses in immunohistochemistry. J Clin Pathol. 2008;61(11):1184–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Du J, Liu JY, Su J. Comparison of two different tissue decalcification methods for immunohistochemistry [in Chinese]. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao. 2011;43(2):290–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. CAP checklists 2013 for anatomic pathology. http://www.cap.org. Accessed 30 Nov 2013. In press (December, 2014).
  14. Geisinger IHC website. http://www.ihcfaq.com. Accessed 30 Nov 2013. In press (December, 2014).
  15. NordiQC: Nordic immunohistochemical quality control. http://www.nordiqc.org. Accessed 18 and 19 Jan 2014. In press (December, 2014).
  16. Renshaw S, editor. Immunohistochemistry: methods express. Oxfordshire: Scion; 2007.Google Scholar
  17. Hyatt MA. Microscopy, immunohistochemistry and antigen retrieval methods: for light and electron microscopy. New York, NY: Kluwer/Plenum; 2002.Google Scholar
  18. Fitzgibbons PL, Bradley LA, Fatheree LA, et al. Principles of analytic validation of immunohistochemical assays: guideline from the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center. 2014. Arch Pathol Lab Med. [published online ahead of print March 19, 2014]. In press (December, 2014).Google Scholar
  19. Taylor C. Issues in using whole slide imaging for diagnostic pathology: “routine” stains, immunohistochemistry and predictive markers. 2013. Biotech Histochem. doi:10.3109/10520295.2013.861512. [published online ahead of print December 11, 2013].
  20. Shinde V, Burke KE, Chakravarty A, et al. Applications of pathology-assisted image analysis of immunohistochemistry-based biomarkers in oncology. Vet Pathol. 2014;51(1):202–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Keay T, Conway CM, O’Flaherty N, Hewitt SM, Shea K, Gavrielides MA. Reproducibility in the automated quantitative assessment of HER2/neu for breast cancer. J Pathol Inform. 2013;4:19.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kondo Y, Iijima T, Noguchi M. Evaluation of immunohistochemical staining using whole-slide imaging for HER2 scoring of breast cancer in comparison with real glass slides. Pathol Int. 2012;62(9):592–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Camparo P, Egevad L, Algaba F, et al. Utility of whole slide imaging and virtual microscopy in prostate pathology. APMIS. 2012;120(4):298–304.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Feldman MD. Beyond morphology: whole slide imaging, computer-aided detection, and other techniques. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2008;132(5):758–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Laurinavicius A, Laurinaviciene A, Ostapenko V, Dasevicius D, Jarmalaite S, Lazutka J. Immunohistochemistry profiles of breast ductal carcinoma: factor analysis of digital image analysis data. Diagn Pathol. 2012;7:27.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. UK NEQAS: United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Service. http://www.ukneqas.org.uk. Accessed 18 and 19 Jan 2014.
Posted :